Autodynamics
A Paradigm in Physics-Cosmology proving - after correcting a Lorentz's misconception, took by Einstein without any criticism to develope his Special Relativity - which is absolutely flawed. His General Relativity is a simple FANTASIA without any Scientific Basis as it is proved by Dr. Carezani on his New Paradigm, dubbed "Autodynamics" by short. CASTELLANO http://autodynamicsusa.comxa.com page 4 y... Lucy Haye PH. D. SAA's Representative Long Beach, CA -USA lucyhaye22@gmail.com
Wednesday, April 27, 2016
Tuesday, January 12, 2016
Why is Pauli Wrong?
Why is Pauuli Wrong?
The TOTAL MASS LOST insude the decayng Bi to Po, in units is equal to
1.16 MeV
The outside Energy is given by the Flaying Electron Rest Mass (mo)
plus its Kinetic Energy (KEe)
This TOTAL ENERGY putside the Po needto be equal to the Total
Energy availablee of 1.16) MeV since the Energy Conservacion is
an Universal Law.
Total Energy = mo + KEe
1.16 MeV = 0.511 MeV + KEe Me
KEe MeV = 1.16 MeV - 0.511 MeV
KEe Me = 0.649 MeV
This is the maximum possible vulue provided by the available Mass
There is NOT ANY Energy LOST
It is NOT needed neither any Ghost Particle nor any penetrating Radiation
To conserve Energy. In simple words: NO NEUTRINO.
Where come from the Pauli's LOST Energy?
He applied the SR's KE equation which yield, by pure coincidence: KEe =
-. 1.16 MeV.
This is IMPOSSIBLE because now Total Energy is
1.16 + 0.511 = 1.671 MeV.
This value is BIGGER than the available one equal to
1.16 MeV
Yhere is NOT Energy Concervation: SR is Wrong.
The whole citcle is closed
Ot is very well lnoen that the Bi Decaying to Po is due to the the Neutron
Decaying to a Proton-Electron. The Proton stays inside the Nucleud and
the Electron flying outside.
Neutro Mass = 2.008 664 915 74 au
Proton Mass = 1.007 825 032 07 au
Mass diference =. 0.000 839 883 67 au
To convert this to Energy is muigiplird. by 931.494 322
Total available Energy = 0.782 MeV
This Kinetic Energy is distribuited between the Proton which stay
inside the Nucleus , and the Electron flying outside the Element. As
the electron Rnergy os equal to 0.849 MeV, the difference from 0.782
Is taken by the Proton:
0.782 MeV
~. 0.649 MeV (Kinetic Energy get by the Electron)
= 0.133 MeV (Kinetic Energy get by the Proton)
The whole process is perfectly closed and in prrfectt equlity
because
0.649 + 0.511 = 1.16 MeV
Equall to the Total Energy available.
Neither Any Neutrino nor penetration Radiation is neede .
Pauli is wrong because Einsteiniswrong!
And also temember: All values are takind ffrom a prosaicc table of Elements!!!
The TOTAL MASS LOST insude the decayng Bi to Po, in units is equal to
1.16 MeV
The outside Energy is given by the Flaying Electron Rest Mass (mo)
plus its Kinetic Energy (KEe)
This TOTAL ENERGY putside the Po needto be equal to the Total
Energy availablee of 1.16) MeV since the Energy Conservacion is
an Universal Law.
Total Energy = mo + KEe
1.16 MeV = 0.511 MeV + KEe Me
KEe MeV = 1.16 MeV - 0.511 MeV
KEe Me = 0.649 MeV
This is the maximum possible vulue provided by the available Mass
There is NOT ANY Energy LOST
It is NOT needed neither any Ghost Particle nor any penetrating Radiation
To conserve Energy. In simple words: NO NEUTRINO.
Where come from the Pauli's LOST Energy?
He applied the SR's KE equation which yield, by pure coincidence: KEe =
-. 1.16 MeV.
This is IMPOSSIBLE because now Total Energy is
1.16 + 0.511 = 1.671 MeV.
This value is BIGGER than the available one equal to
1.16 MeV
Yhere is NOT Energy Concervation: SR is Wrong.
The whole citcle is closed
Ot is very well lnoen that the Bi Decaying to Po is due to the the Neutron
Decaying to a Proton-Electron. The Proton stays inside the Nucleud and
the Electron flying outside.
Neutro Mass = 2.008 664 915 74 au
Proton Mass = 1.007 825 032 07 au
Mass diference =. 0.000 839 883 67 au
To convert this to Energy is muigiplird. by 931.494 322
Total available Energy = 0.782 MeV
This Kinetic Energy is distribuited between the Proton which stay
inside the Nucleus , and the Electron flying outside the Element. As
the electron Rnergy os equal to 0.849 MeV, the difference from 0.782
Is taken by the Proton:
0.782 MeV
~. 0.649 MeV (Kinetic Energy get by the Electron)
= 0.133 MeV (Kinetic Energy get by the Proton)
The whole process is perfectly closed and in prrfectt equlity
because
0.649 + 0.511 = 1.16 MeV
Equall to the Total Energy available.
Neither Any Neutrino nor penetration Radiation is neede .
Pauli is wrong because Einsteiniswrong!
And also temember: All values are takind ffrom a prosaicc table of Elements!!!
Monday, June 29, 2015
Wednesday, January 14, 2015
Tuesday, February 18, 2014
Pioneer 11/10 and the Solar Mass
Pioneer 11/10 and the Solar Mass.
Even though the
auto-called *scientific Community* accept, in a big proportion, that the
Pioneer anomaly is related to its radioactive engine, there is another Satellite,
the Ulysses orbiting the Sun, which show that the engine approach is absolutely
erroneous. Ulysses has a positive acceleration when it is approaching the Sun
and a negative one when it is moving away from it.
Ulysses orbiting the Sun. (Image from NASA, Hubble Satellite
publication)
NASA, using the
Assist Dynamics, provided de force to send the Pioneer outside the Solar System
but it is the Sun who has the traveling absolute control after the NASA force
stopped. Really Nature, as a whole, is what has the total control because the
Satellite’s measured velocity depends on the equation used to find it. NASA is
erroneously using the old static Newton
Celestial Mechanics and the so called anomaly doesn’t exist because that
Celestial Mechanics fail to calculate the real effect provoked by Nature.
The so called
negative acceleration is only the difference between the values calculated with
Newton equations
and the Sun actual mass. The force that
provokes the Satellite acceleration is bigger than the calculated, since the
actual mass is bigger than the used, which, of course, is also calculated with Newton gravitation equation.
Autodynamics
Equation F = G M* m* / d2
F = Force, G = Gravitational Constant, M = Solar Mass, m = Satellite mass, * = Mass Increment
The Autodynamics
Celestial Mechanics provide a bigger value than the Newtonian one.
To see how the mass increment is
get see:
A-20- Autodynamics Gravitation
Applied to Lageos-Mercury.
To clear understand the
Autodynamics Gravitation Mechanics see:
Quantum Universal Gravitation
Autodynamics is supported by many results get from many
different applications
It explains: The
motion creation (Planets Perihelion Advance and Lageos
Satellites).
The increasing Gravitation
in Eclipse Time.
The increasing Galaxies
size looking at billions year far away.
Moon receding from Earth.
Spacecraft Assist
micro-acceleration.
Gravitation Non-Propagation
velocity. The Graviton has velocity;
Gravitation has NOT. It is actually present in the whole Universe.
It is Paramount
to point it out here that the Autodynamics’ author didn’t invent neither any
theory nor any particular hypothesis to explain each phenomenon.
It is a simple mechanism after elevating to a Universal Law
two concepts very well known: Mass Decay-Energy Absorption.
We made a simple program to calculate the Solar mass
correctly using the Pioneer 10-11 “real position and fly’s time”. (We are not totally
sure of the data because NASA never answered any question).
From the program
output we include only three values for acceleration proving the given
values and the actual Solar mass, which, of course doesn’t give any
***anomaly.*** The Pioneer position is given by Nature and the anomaly is
introduce by ourselves, due to the fail of Newton Static equation corrected by
Autodynamics , the New Paradigm by Carezani, as a dynamics one with his Quantum
Universal Gravitation and consequently with his new Celestial Mechanics.
The Program.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>
#include <float.h>
#include <bios.h>
#define t 2.3974683E17
/* Seconds in 7.504 Billion/year */
#define d1 10.0E13
/* Pioneer d1 distance in cm */
#define d2 21.0E13
/* “ d2
“ “ */
#define d3 30.0E13
/* “ d3
“ “ */
#define G 6.67259E-8
/* Gravitational Constant in
cm^3/gr sec^2 */
#define M 1.9891E33
/* Sun Mass in gr */
#define P 2.6698913E30
/* All planets Mass in gr */
#define MP 1.99176989E33 /* Total Mass (Sun + Planets) in
gr) */
#define Sy 3.157056E7
/* Second in ONE year */
#define a1c 10.3E-8 /* Anomaly Acceleration measure
#define a2c 8.05E-8 /* “ “ “ */
#define a3c 6.3E-8 /* “ “ “ */
Main()
{
Double
a1,a2,a3,as3,as1, a1t, a3t, ,M1,M2,M3,Minc,Msec,My,Mt,Mfo,A,
Mfo,A,Mfc,M27,Mi,Mad;
Print(“ ***** NEWTON ’S MECHANICS *****\n\n”);
a1 = (G * M)
/ (d1 * d1);
printf(a1
=%2.10E Acceleration at d1 distance\n\n”.a1);
a2 = G * M) /
(d2 * d2);
printf (“a2 =
%2.10E Acceleration at d2 distance\n\n”,a2);
a3 = (G * M)
/ (d3 * d3);
printf(“a3 =
%2.10E Acceleration at d3 distance\n\n”,a3);
printf(“ ***** CAREZANI’S
MECHANICS*****\n\n”);
M1 = (a1c *
d1 * d1) / G;
printf(“M1 =
%2.15E Solar mass in time 1 \n\n”,M1);
M2 = (a2c *
d2 * d2) / G;
printf(“M2 =
%2.15E Solar mass in time 2 \n\n”,M2);
M3 = (a3c *
d3 * d3) / G;
printf(“M3 =
%2.15E Solar mass in time 3 \n\n”,M3);
My = Msec *
Sy * 27;
printf((“My =
%2.10E Total mass increment in 27 year\n\n”,My);
Mfo = M + M3;
printf(“Mfo =
%2.15E Final observed mass (M+M3)\n\n”,Mfo);
Mfc = M + My;
printf(“Mfc =
%2.20E Total (M+My) mass in 27 year\n\n\”,Mfc);
Mi = (Mfo –
Mfc) + M;
printf(“Mi
=2.29E Actual Sun Mass ((Mfo-Mfc)+M)\n\n”,Mi);
Mad = (Mi – M) / 1E33;
printf(“Mad =
%2.20E Mass ((Mi-M)/11E33) needed to be added to M\n\n”,Mad);
as3 =a3
+a3c;
printf(“as3
=%2.15E Acceleration SUM (a3+a3c)\n\n”,as3);
a3t = (G +
Mi) / (d3 * d3);
printf(“a3t =
%2.15E Acceleration TEST ((G*Mi)/(d3*de)\n\n”,a3r);
as1 = a1
+a1c;
printf(“as1 =
%2.15E Acceleration SUM (a1+a1C
a1t = (G *
Mi) / (d1 * d1);
printf(“a1t
= %2.15E Acceleration TEST((G*Mi)/(d1*d1)\n\n”,a1t);
}
Program output:
Only two values; Sum and Test
a3t = 1.4747795246456E-3
as1 =
1.3272551769000E-2
a1t =
1.32730157218106E-2
Actual Sun
Mass:
1.989184967428E+033 A difference in the 5th decimal position.
Friday, January 24, 2014
Einstein's Photo-Electric Effec and its Consequence,
Einstein's Photo-Electric Effect and its Consequence
We received many
times the CLASSIC Question:
What is the
Experiment proving right Einstein’s Special Relativity?
To tell the plain
TRUTH there is NOT ANY experiment proving Einstein right.
The only experiment
performed by Einstein, the Photo-Electric experiment, which gave him the Nobel
Prize, proved Special Relativity Wrong!
The Photoelectric Effect.
The only experiment that confirm Einstein right is his
Photoelectric experiment (P.E.E.), but unfortunately for him, CONTRADICT his
Especial Relativity.
P.E.E.: A photon strike an Electron inside a material
medium, ejecting it.
This yielded a surprisingly reality: His
Photo-Electric-Effect CONTRADICT his Special Relativity because on it he
support that the Photon has not mass as required condition to travel at c to
satisfies his equations. BUT the Electron has MOMENTUM and the Momentum Conservation Law is
not conserved between the Electron and Photon.
Einstein didn’t pronounce a word on this failure and the
“Scientific Community” made the Ostrich classical action introducing his head
in the sand.
Nevertheless the Planck’s equations proved that the Photon
has mass using also the Einstein equation E = m0 c2 (1)
(This equation was published in Italy
TWO years before Einstein proposed it)
In Planck E = h f (2)
where E = energy, h = the Planck constant, f = the light frequency,
Following: (2) = (1)
h f = m0 c2
(3) m0 = h f
/ c2 (4)
p (momentum) = m0
c (5) (Classical Newton ),
p = (h f / c2 ) * c
= h f / c (6)
This is confirmed by the Compton ’s Effect experiment which is also
explained poorly by the Special Relativity that cannot calculate its values
correctly.
The whole TRUTH is that neither SR nor General relativity
(GR) explains any natural experimental phenomenon.
GR cannot explain neither from where is get the Force to Increase the Planet Mercury increasing velocity, which is call Perihelion Advance, nor the Lageos Satellites Precession. In the Mercury case the empirical equation give a value, as
Sunday, January 19, 2014
Comparing the Actual Galaxies sizes with the Old one.
Autodynamics New Paradigm in Physics-Cosmology continue
accumulating explanations in many new discoveries in this matter, which cannot
be explained by the Classic Mechanics, and what is worst, neither by Special
and General Relativity.
The Hubble Picture Published by NASA:
NASA published a few weeks ago a picture with the actual
Galaxies size and the distant one around 11.1 bly. The Picture show that the
far away Galaxies were smaller than the actual one, being the old one around
1/5 to ½ smaller, which cannot be explained
neither Cosmologically by the Actual
Paradigm including General Relativity, and , of course, Newton.
The explanation is very simple when we have the correct
Celestial Mechanics given by the Quantum Universal Gravitation, where the
Celestial bodies increase their Mass by the Gravitational Quantum (Graviton)
absorption by matter, which provide the force that provoke the Planet Perihelion Advance, the Lageos
Satellites precession, the Spacecraft slowdown as the Pioneers 10/12. etc,, the
increasing micro acceleration in the Assist action to increase the spacecrafts’
velocities, the increasing Gravity during Eclipse time, etc, under the
fundamental Law of Mass Decay-Energy Absorption, which maintain the Universe in
Perpetual Motion and Evolution.
Also see:
Quantum Universal Gravitation
A-20- Autodynamics Gravitation
Applied to Lageos-Mercury.
Regarding the Galaxies’ size related to the time that light
travel to reach us the explanation is easier since the average calculated using
the Celestial Mechanics through known values as the Mercury Perihelion Advance
and Lageos Satellite Precession is 7.594 by to double any body mass in the
Cosmos.
A galaxy with apparent size equal to 1/5 (0.2), to day it
has 0.592 and with 0.5 it has 1.48. You could calculate the whole relative
sizes in the picture.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)