A Paradigm in Physics-Cosmology proving - after correcting a Lorentz's misconception, took by Einstein without any criticism to develope his Special Relativity - which is absolutely flawed. His General Relativity is a simple FANTASIA without any Scientific Basis as it is proved by Dr. Carezani on his New Paradigm, dubbed "Autodynamics" by short.
CASTELLANO http://autodynamicsusa.comxa.com page 4 y...
Lucy Haye PH. D.
Long Beach, CA -USA
Friday, January 24, 2014
Einstein's Photo-Electric Effec and its Consequence,
Einstein's Photo-Electric Effect and its Consequence
We received many
times the CLASSIC Question:
What is the
Experiment proving right Einstein’s Special Relativity?
To tell the plain
TRUTH there is NOT ANY experiment proving Einstein right.
The only experiment
performed by Einstein, the Photo-Electric experiment, which gave him the Nobel
Prize, proved Special Relativity Wrong!
The Photoelectric Effect.
The only experiment that confirm Einstein right is his
Photoelectric experiment (P.E.E.), but unfortunately for him, CONTRADICT his
P.E.E.: A photon strike an Electron inside a material
medium, ejecting it.
This yielded a surprisingly reality: His
Photo-Electric-Effect CONTRADICT his Special Relativity because on it he
support that the Photon has not mass as required condition to travel at c to
satisfies his equations. BUT the Electron has MOMENTUM and the Momentum Conservation Law is
not conserved between the Electron and Photon.
Einstein didn’t pronounce a word on this failure and the
“Scientific Community” made the Ostrich classical action introducing his head
in the sand.
Nevertheless the Planck’s equations proved that the Photon
has mass using also the Einstein equation E = m0 c2 (1)
(This equation was published in Italy
TWO years before Einstein proposed it)
In Planck E = h f(2)
where E = energy, h = the Planck constant, f = the light frequency,
Following: (2) = (1)h f = m0 c2(3)m0 = h f
p (momentum)= m0
c (5) (Classical Newton),
p = (h f / c2 ) * c
=h f / c(6)
This is confirmed by the Compton’s Effect experiment which is also
explained poorly by the Special Relativity that cannot calculate its values
The whole TRUTH is that neither SR nor General relativity
(GR) explains any natural experimental phenomenon.
GR cannot explain neither from where is get the
Force to Increase the Planet Mercury increasing velocity, which is call
Perihelion Advance, nor the Lageos Satellites Precession. In the Mercury case
the empirical equation give a value, as Newton
also can do with different value, but both without any mechanism or machinery
to explain it. In the Lageos case his space dragging proved to be another
fantasy confirmed by the Probe B with a total failure to measure any value.