A Paradigm in Physics-Cosmology proving - after correcting a Lorentz's misconception, took by Einstein without any criticism to develope his Special Relativity - which is absolutely flawed. His General Relativity is a simple FANTASIA without any Scientific Basis as it is proved by Dr. Carezani on his New Paradigm, dubbed "Autodynamics" by short.
CASTELLANO http://autodynamicsusa.comxa.com page 4 y...
Lucy Haye PH. D.
Long Beach, CA -USA
Even though the
auto-called *scientific Community* accept, in a big proportion, that the
Pioneer anomaly is related to its radioactive engine, there is another Satellite,
the Ulysses orbiting the Sun, which show that the engine approach is absolutely
erroneous. Ulysses has a positive acceleration when it is approaching the Sun
and a negative one when it is moving away from it.
Ulysses orbiting the Sun. (Image from NASA, Hubble Satellite
NASA, using the
Assist Dynamics, provided de force to send the Pioneer outside the Solar System
but it is the Sun who has the traveling absolute control after the NASA force
stopped. Really Nature, as a whole, is what has the total control because the
Satellite’s measured velocity depends on the equation used to find it. NASA is
erroneously using the old static Newton
Celestial Mechanics and the so called anomaly doesn’t exist because that
Celestial Mechanics fail to calculate the real effect provoked by Nature.
The so called
negative acceleration is only the difference between the values calculated with
and the Sun actual mass. The force that
provokes the Satellite acceleration is bigger than the calculated, since the
actual mass is bigger than the used, which, of course, is also calculated with Newton gravitation equation.
Newton EquationF = G M m / d2
Equation F = G M* m* / d2
F = Force,G = Gravitational Constant,M = Solar Mass,m = Satellite mass, * = Mass Increment
Celestial Mechanics provide a bigger value than the Newtonian one.
To see how the mass increment is
A-20- Autodynamics Gravitation
Applied to Lageos-Mercury.
Autodynamics is supported by many results get from many
It explains: The
motion creation (Planets Perihelion Advance and Lageos
The increasing Gravitation
in Eclipse Time.
The increasing Galaxies
size looking at billions year far away.
Moon receding from Earth.
velocity. The Graviton has velocity;Gravitation has NOT. It is actually present in the whole Universe.
It is Paramount
to point it out here that the Autodynamics’ author didn’t invent neither any
theory nor any particular hypothesis to explain each phenomenon.
It is a simple mechanism after elevating to a Universal Law
two concepts very well known: Mass Decay-Energy Absorption.
We made a simple program to calculate the Solar mass
correctly using the Pioneer 10-11 “real position and fly’s time”. (We are not totally
sure of the data because NASA never answered any question).
From the programoutput we include only three values for acceleration proving the given
values and the actual Solar mass, which, of course doesn’t give any
***anomaly.*** The Pioneer position is given by Nature and the anomaly is
introduce by ourselves, due to the fail of Newton Static equation corrected by
Autodynamics , the New Paradigm by Carezani, as a dynamics one with his Quantum
Universal Gravitation and consequently with his new Celestial Mechanics.
#define t 2.3974683E17/* Seconds in 7.504 Billion/year */
#define d1 10.0E13/* Pioneer d1 distance in cm */
#define d2 21.0E13/*“d2““*/
#define d3 30.0E13/*“d3““*/
#define G 6.67259E-8/*Gravitational Constant in
#define M 1.9891E33/* Sun Mass in gr */
#define P 2.6698913E30/* All planets Mass in gr */
#define MP 1.99176989E33 /* Total Mass (Sun + Planets) in
Einstein's Photo-Electric Effect and its Consequence
We received many
times the CLASSIC Question:
What is the
Experiment proving right Einstein’s Special Relativity?
To tell the plain
TRUTH there is NOT ANY experiment proving Einstein right.
The only experiment
performed by Einstein, the Photo-Electric experiment, which gave him the Nobel
Prize, proved Special Relativity Wrong!
The Photoelectric Effect.
The only experiment that confirm Einstein right is his
Photoelectric experiment (P.E.E.), but unfortunately for him, CONTRADICT his
P.E.E.: A photon strike an Electron inside a material
medium, ejecting it.
This yielded a surprisingly reality: His
Photo-Electric-Effect CONTRADICT his Special Relativity because on it he
support that the Photon has not mass as required condition to travel at c to
satisfies his equations. BUT the Electron has MOMENTUM and the Momentum Conservation Law is
not conserved between the Electron and Photon.
Einstein didn’t pronounce a word on this failure and the
“Scientific Community” made the Ostrich classical action introducing his head
in the sand.
Nevertheless the Planck’s equations proved that the Photon
has mass using also the Einstein equation E = m0 c2 (1)
(This equation was published in Italy
TWO years before Einstein proposed it)
In Planck E = h f(2)
where E = energy, h = the Planck constant, f = the light frequency,
Following: (2) = (1)h f = m0 c2(3)m0 = h f
p (momentum)= m0
c (5) (Classical Newton),
p = (h f / c2 ) * c
=h f / c(6)
This is confirmed by the Compton’s Effect experiment which is also
explained poorly by the Special Relativity that cannot calculate its values
The whole TRUTH is that neither SR nor General relativity
(GR) explains any natural experimental phenomenon.
GR cannot explain neither from where is get the
Force to Increase the Planet Mercury increasing velocity, which is call
Perihelion Advance, nor the Lageos Satellites Precession. In the Mercury case
the empirical equation give a value, as Newton
also can do with different value, but both without any mechanism or machinery
to explain it. In the Lageos case his space dragging proved to be another
fantasy confirmed by the Probe B with a total failure to measure any value.
Autodynamics New Paradigm in Physics-Cosmology continue
accumulating explanations in many new discoveries in this matter, which cannot
be explained by the Classic Mechanics, and what is worst, neither by Special
and General Relativity.
NASA published a few weeks ago a picture with the actual
Galaxies size and the distant one around 11.1 bly. The Picture show that the
far away Galaxies were smaller than the actual one, being the old one around
1/5 to½ smaller, which cannot be explained
neitherCosmologically by the Actual
Paradigm including General Relativity, and , of course, Newton.
The explanation is very simple when we have the correct
Celestial Mechanics given by the Quantum Universal Gravitation, where the
Celestial bodies increase their Mass by the Gravitational Quantum (Graviton)
absorption by matter, which provide the force that provokethe Planet Perihelion Advance, the Lageos
Satellites precession, the Spacecraft slowdown as the Pioneers 10/12. etc,, the
increasing micro acceleration in the Assist action to increase the spacecrafts’
velocities, the increasing Gravity during Eclipse time, etc, under the
fundamental Law of Mass Decay-Energy Absorption, which maintain the Universe in
Perpetual Motion and Evolution.
Regarding the Galaxies’ size related to the time that light
travel to reach us the explanation is easier since the average calculated using
the Celestial Mechanics through known values as the Mercury Perihelion Advance
and Lageos Satellite Precession is 7.594 by to double any body mass in the
A galaxy with apparent size equal to 1/5 (0.2), to day it
has 0.592 and with 0.5 it has 1.48. You could calculate the whole relative
sizes in the picture.