Autodynamics
A Paradigm in Physics-Cosmology proving - after correcting a Lorentz's misconception, took by Einstein without any criticism to develope his Special Relativity - that he is absolutely flawed. His General Relativity is a simple FANTASIA without any Scientific Basis as it is proved by Dr. Carezani on his New Paradigm, dubbed "Autodynamics" by short. Lucy Haye PH. D. SAA's Representative Long Beach, CA -USA lucyhaye22@gmail.com , lucyhaye@charter net
Friday, March 8, 2013
Monday, February 4, 2013
Wednesday, January 16, 2013
Tuesday, January 8, 2013
Teaching Autodynamics Award rise to $65,000.00
To Professors,Teachers and group of
Students.
The Professor that want to make a contribution to
Science, teaching this New Paradigm, which will open the Gate to the Stars,
will get, without any cost, the two AD’s BOOKS by R. L. Carezani, published by
SAA (Society for the Advancement of Autodynamics, and two DVD on Gravitation
and Science’s History.
To get this,
unfortunately, due that our pass expectation was not plenty accomplished, and
to one economic stimulus as it is offered below, the interested Professor must send a Letter-Program espousing basically How,
When and Where he will give the lectures. Also, attached to the Letter-Program
must be send the authorization to him, by the Faculty’s authority, to lecture
the New Paradigm.
Of course, that information should be possible to confirm
whether via Internet or the WEB
The
Postal address is:
SAA
801 Pine Ave. 211
What was offered above, is a help to
obtain a small and UNIQUE stimulus of
$65,000.00 (Sixty five thousand American dollars) for the FIRST and ONLY ONE Professor
that will get the qualification higher score for starting NEWS in the International Press, especially in
USA
y Europe, on the teaching of Autodynamics, as a New Paradigm in Physics and
Cosmology. (To see details section)
Of course, this small economic stimulus will go,
undoubtedly together, as coming from a visionary, with the Glory to be the
first to teach the New Insight, to a New Generation of Students, to create New
Scientists, just because the actual one are paralyzed in the actual erroneous
Paradigm.
Please, any fast consultation via
Internet to
Lucyhaye22@gmail.com
Sincerely
tours.
SAA. (Society for the Advancement of
Autodynamics)
Details Section.
Press International
Press International is a synthesis that will take in account
the Newspaper, Magazine and Scientific
Magazine’s quality and its relevance, as
example: The New York Times, Newsweek, Wall Street Journal, TIME, Washington
Post, Los Angeles Time, The Scientist, etc. in USA.
This same criterion will be applied to Europe y Asia,
as England, France, Italy, Russia, Sweden, Norway, etc., o Japan, China, India,
Australia, etc., with the same quality and relevance in the public information.
References.
The publication’s references, that at least must come
from five (5) different important countries, must contain the Professor’s name,
the University’s name, which will play an important value to get the best
qualification, and a clear mention that what is thought follow the New Paradigm
as it is espoused in the AD’s two books: “Storm in Physics” ISBN 0-9665533-4-9,
and “Fundamental Basis for a New Relativistic Mechanics” ISBN 9665533-1-4.
Final Decision.
It is clearly stated that the Final Decision to give
the stimulus is under the SAA’s absolute discretion to decide if the
International Information accomplish with the minimum required qualification by
this detailed rules, without any possible appeal, legal or not, with the only
intention, by AD, to avoid any tergiversation regarding the SAA’s goal.
Monday, January 7, 2013
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Sunday, June 24, 2012
A28.- Uranium238 Decay.
It is well-known that the calorimetric U238 fission experiment yields a minimum value of 163 MeV [1] and a maximum of 177 MeV[2]
The following example is simple, but is based on actual U238 decay.
One mode of U238 fission is a decay into four new atoms or particles that conserve momentum.
For simplicity[3], M1 escapes to the left and M2, M3 and M4 escape to the right on the same line of action.
Of course, the sum of the masses of the four particles after decay, plus their respective kinetic energy, equals the parent particle energy of 238 mass units. We will show that this is not the case when using SR.
The computer program is simple and the calculation in each step is performed by reiteration until momentum conservation is attained.
Two distinct cases will be calculated: Momentum conservation using SR, which will not yield momentum conservation in AD, of course, but as will be pointed out, the AD energy is between the experimental values measured. The other case, using AD momentum conservation (not in SR) surprisingly yields approximately the same theoretical value as the first case.
Physics students should study this example carefully and deeply. Since it is well understood, this example helps to clarify all doubts regarding the SR mistakes when it is applied to concrete phenomena. The SR theory seems congruent within its own theoretical framework, but when its equations are applied to numerical calculations, erroneous results show, evidently, that the SR formalism is wrong (See A7).
Following is a short analysis of the results given by the two computer programs.
CASE 1.
In case 1, the particles' velocities are given to conserve momentum with SR's equations.
M1 momentum equals 1097.309 MeV/c.
M2, M3, M4 momentum sum equals 1097.364 MeV/c (Small difference due to the approximation used).
Kinetic energy is equal to 204.6189 MeV and the increasing mass after decay equal to 238.2197 in mass units, which is larger than the initial mass of 238 mass units, and is equivalent, of course, to another 204. 6184 MeV.
We see here the increasing system energy after applying SR KE and mass variation equations. This confirms what AD says elsewhere: SR's equations apply when the particle receives external energy. In a decay case, the system’s energy should stay constant and this doesn't happen here.
Using AD’s equations with the same values taken from SR we have
M1 momentum equals 1097.231 MeV/c.
M2, M3, M4 momentum sum equals 891.9951 MeV/c, and , of course there is no momentum conservation. But what is interesting to point out, the kinetic energy sum equal 169.665 and the AD particle mass added equals 237.8179 mass units. The "missing mass" provides the gain in kinetic energy. The difference between 238 and 237.8179 mass units, equal to 0.1821 gives 169.667 MeV of kinetic energy. In AD, even using wrong values for velocities, there is energy conservation.
CASE 2.
In case two, the particles' velocities are given to conserve momentum with AD's equations.
M1 momentum equal 991.0875 MeV/c.
M2, M3, M4 momentum sum equals 991.0734 MeV/c. (The small difference comes from the same reason given earlier.)
AD kinetic energy equals 169.2992 MeV and the mass sum equals 237.8183 MeV which, when subtracted from 238 gives 0.1817 that represents 169.2992 MeV, the particles’ kinetic energy.
In conclusion AD perfectly explains the experimental results, conserving momentum and energy without any contradiction, as in the SR calculation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










